UNION PAC R CO v. CHICAGO, R I & P R CO, 163 U.S. 611 (1896)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

UNION PAC R CO v. CHICAGO, R I & P R CO, 163 U.S. 611 (1896)

163 U.S. 611

UNION PAC. RY. CO. et al.
v.
CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.

UNION PAC. RY. CO.
v.
CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. RY. CO.

Nos. 41, 42.

May 25, 1896

John F. Dillon and John M. Thurston, for appellants.

J. M. Woolworth, for appellee Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

George R. Peck, for appellee Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

These appeals were from the circuit court and the cases have just been disposed of on appeals from the circuit court of appeals. See 2 C. C. A. 174, 51 Fed. 309. Appeals dismissed.[ Union Pac R Co v. Chicago, R I & P R Co 163 U.S. 611 (1896) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

UNION PAC R CO v. CHICAGO, R I & P R CO, 163 U.S. 611 (1896)

163 U.S. 611

UNION PAC. RY. CO. et al.
v.
CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.

UNION PAC. RY. CO.
v.
CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. RY. CO.

Nos. 41, 42.

May 25, 1896

John F. Dillon and John M. Thurston, for appellants.

J. M. Woolworth, for appellee Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

George R. Peck, for appellee Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

These appeals were from the circuit court and the cases have just been disposed of on appeals from the circuit court of appeals. See 2 C. C. A. 174, 51 Fed. 309. Appeals dismissed.[ Union Pac R Co v. Chicago, R I & P R Co 163 U.S. 611 (1896) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.