UNION PAC R CO v. CHICAGO, R I & P R CO, 163 U.S. 611 (1896)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

UNION PAC R CO v. CHICAGO, R I & P R CO, 163 U.S. 611 (1896)

163 U.S. 611

UNION PAC. RY. CO. et al.
v.
CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.

UNION PAC. RY. CO.
v.
CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. RY. CO.

Nos. 41, 42.

May 25, 1896

John F. Dillon and John M. Thurston, for appellants.

J. M. Woolworth, for appellee Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

George R. Peck, for appellee Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

These appeals were from the circuit court and the cases have just been disposed of on appeals from the circuit court of appeals. See 2 C. C. A. 174, 51 Fed. 309. Appeals dismissed.[ Union Pac R Co v. Chicago, R I & P R Co 163 U.S. 611 (1896) ]



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

UNION PAC R CO v. CHICAGO, R I & P R CO, 163 U.S. 611 (1896)  163 U.S. 611

UNION PAC. RY. CO. et al.
v.
CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.

UNION PAC. RY. CO.
v.
CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. RY. CO.

Nos. 41, 42.

May 25, 1896

John F. Dillon and John M. Thurston, for appellants.

J. M. Woolworth, for appellee Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

George R. Peck, for appellee Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

These appeals were from the circuit court and the cases have just been disposed of on appeals from the circuit court of appeals. See 2 C. C. A. 174, 51 Fed. 309. Appeals dismissed.[ Union Pac R Co v. Chicago, R I & P R Co 163 U.S. 611 (1896) ]