Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896)
U.S. Supreme Court
Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896)Baltzer and Taaks v. North Carolina
No. 52
Argued February 3-4, 1896
Decided March 2, 1896
161 U.S. 246
Syllabus
Baltzer v. North Carolina, ante, 161 U. S. 240, followed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
U.S. Supreme Court
Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896)Baltzer and Taaks v. North Carolina
No. 52
Argued February 3-4, 1896
Decided March 2, 1896
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Syllabus
Baltzer v. North Carolina, ante, 161 U. S. 240, followed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
The claim presented in this case to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina differs somewhat from that relied on in that court in the case of Baltzer v. North Carolina, No. 93 of the docket of this Court. The question of the power in the state court to give the relief prayed for was by it decided adversely to the plaintiff in error upon grounds identical with those considered by us in the case just decided. Our reasons for affirmance there expressed are conclusive of the issues here, and consequently the judgment is
Affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
