Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896)

Baltzer and Taaks v. North Carolina

No. 52

Argued February 3-4, 1896

Decided March 2, 1896

161 U.S. 246

Syllabus

Baltzer v. North Carolina, ante, 161 U. S. 240, followed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Page 161 U. S. 247

U.S. Supreme Court

Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896)

Baltzer and Taaks v. North Carolina

No. 52

Argued February 3-4, 1896

Decided March 2, 1896

161 U.S. 246

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Syllabus

Baltzer v. North Carolina, ante, 161 U. S. 240, followed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Page 161 U. S. 247

MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

The claim presented in this case to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina differs somewhat from that relied on in that court in the case of Baltzer v. North Carolina, No. 93 of the docket of this Court. The question of the power in the state court to give the relief prayed for was by it decided adversely to the plaintiff in error upon grounds identical with those considered by us in the case just decided. Our reasons for affirmance there expressed are conclusive of the issues here, and consequently the judgment is

Affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.