Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896)Baltzer and Taaks v. North Carolina
No. 52
Argued February 3-4, 1896
Decided March 2, 1896
161 U.S. 246
Syllabus
Baltzer v. North Carolina, ante, 161 U. S. 240, followed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Opinions
U.S. Supreme Court
Baltzer & Taaks v. North Carolina, 161 U.S. 246 (1896) Baltzer and Taaks v. North Carolina No. 52 Argued February 3-4, 1896 Decided March 2, 1896 161 U.S. 246 ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Syllabus Baltzer v. North Carolina, ante, 161 U. S. 240, followed. The case is stated in the opinion. Page 161 U. S. 247 MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. The claim presented in this case to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina differs somewhat from that relied on in that court in the case of Baltzer v. North Carolina, No. 93 of the docket of this Court. The question of the power in the state court to give the relief prayed for was by it decided adversely to the plaintiff in error upon grounds identical with those considered by us in the case just decided. Our reasons for affirmance there expressed are conclusive of the issues here, and consequently the judgment is Affirmed.
Search This Case