HYDE v. CONTINENTAL TRUST CO OF CITY OF NEW YORK
157 U.S. 654 (1895)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

HYDE v. CONTINENTAL TRUST CO OF CITY OF NEW YORK, 157 U.S. 654 (1895)

157 U.S. 654

HYDE
v.
CONTINENTAL TRUST CO. OF CITY OF NEW YORK et al.
No. 894.

April 8, 1895

Jos. H. Choate, C. A. Seward, B. H. Bristow, Wm. D. Gurtrie, David Willcox, Charles Steele, and Charles F. Southmayd, for appellant.

Hyde. Herbert B. Turner, for appellee Farmers Loan & Trust Co.

James C. Carter, Wm. C. Gulliner, and F. B. Candler, for appellee Continental Trust Co.

Atty. Gen. Olney and Asst. Atty. Gen. Whitney, for the United States.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

This case differs in no assential respect from that just decided ( Pollock v. Trust Co., 15 Sup. Ct. 673), and must be disposed of in the same way.

Decree accordingly.

Mr. Justice WHITE.

For the reasons given in case No. 893 (Pollock v. Trust Co., 15 Sup Ct. 673), I dissent from the decree in this cause.

Note. The opinion rendered by Mr. Justice Field in the case of Pollock v. Trust Co., 15 Sup. Ct. 673, was entitled also in the above case.[ Hyde v. Continental Trust Co of City of New York 157 U.S. 654 (1895) ]


Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.