Bobb v. Jamison, 155 U.S. 416 (1894)
U.S. Supreme Court
Bobb v. Jamison, 155 U.S. 416 (1894)Bobb v. Jamison
No. 267
Submitted December 10, 1894
Decided December 17, 1894
155 U.S. 416
Syllabus
Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377, affirmed and followed.
Motion to dismiss. This cause, after trial below, was argued before the Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2, en banc. The organization of that court is set forth in the statement of facts in Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377. After the court had given its opinion and announced its judgment, the plaintiffs in error for the first time raised a federal question in the cause in a motion for a rehearing. That motion being denied, the case was brought here by writ of error, which writ the defendants in error moved to dismiss.
U.S. Supreme Court
Bobb v. Jamison, 155 U.S. 416 (1894)Bobb v. Jamison
No. 267
Submitted December 10, 1894
Decided December 17, 1894
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377, affirmed and followed.
Motion to dismiss. This cause, after trial below, was argued before the Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2, en banc. The organization of that court is set forth in the statement of facts in Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377. After the court had given its opinion and announced its judgment, the plaintiffs in error for the first time raised a federal question in the cause in a motion for a rehearing. That motion being denied, the case was brought here by writ of error, which writ the defendants in error moved to dismiss.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377, and cases cited.
Writ of error dismissed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
