GERMAIN v. MASON, 154 U.S. 587 (1872)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

GERMAIN v. MASON, 154 U.S. 587 (1872)

154 U.S. 587

GERMAIN
v.
MASON et al.
No. 290.

April 22, 1872.

Page 154 U.S. 587, 588

A. M. Woodfolk, F. A. Dick, and George G. Wright, for plaintiff in error.

J. Hubley Ashton and Nathaniel Wilson, for defendants in error.

Mr. Chief Justice CHASE delivered the opinion of the court.

The writ of error in this case, as in the case of Wells v. McGregor ( decided at this term) 13 Wall. 188, bears the test of the clerk of the supreme court of the territory of Montana, and not the test of the chief justice of this court.

It must therefore be dismissed.


U.S. Supreme Court

GERMAIN v. MASON, 154 U.S. 587 (1872)

154 U.S. 587

GERMAIN
v.
MASON et al.
No. 290.

April 22, 1872.

Page 154 U.S. 587, 588

A. M. Woodfolk, F. A. Dick, and George G. Wright, for plaintiff in error.

J. Hubley Ashton and Nathaniel Wilson, for defendants in error.

Mr. Chief Justice CHASE delivered the opinion of the court.

The writ of error in this case, as in the case of Wells v. McGregor ( decided at this term) 13 Wall. 188, bears the test of the clerk of the supreme court of the territory of Montana, and not the test of the chief justice of this court.

It must therefore be dismissed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.