SCHUYLER NAT BANK v. BOLLONG, 150 U.S. 90 (1893)

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHUYLER NAT BANK v. BOLLONG, 150 U.S. 90 (1893)

150 U.S. 90

SCHUYLER NAT. BANK
v.
BOLLONG. Three Cases.

Nos. 38, 39, and 317.

October 30, 1893

Wm. Twombly and J. G. Bigelow, for plaintiff in error.

C. J. Phelps and Clifton O. Sabin, for defendant in error.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

These cases were submitted at the same time with Bank v. Bollong, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 24, (just decided,) and must be disposed of in the same way. Writs of error dismissed.


U.S. Supreme Court

SCHUYLER NAT BANK v. BOLLONG, 150 U.S. 90 (1893)

150 U.S. 90

SCHUYLER NAT. BANK
v.
BOLLONG. Three Cases.

Nos. 38, 39, and 317.

October 30, 1893

Wm. Twombly and J. G. Bigelow, for plaintiff in error.

C. J. Phelps and Clifton O. Sabin, for defendant in error.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

These cases were submitted at the same time with Bank v. Bollong, 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 24, (just decided,) and must be disposed of in the same way. Writs of error dismissed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.