VINCENT v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 149 U.S. 648 (1893)
U.S. Supreme Court
VINCENT v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 149 U.S. 648 (1893)
149 U.S. 648
VINCENT
v.
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1,316.
May 15, 1893.
W. H. H. Hart, Atty. Gen. Cal., for the motion.
Carroll Cook and G. R. B. Hayes, opposed.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.
This case, which will be found reported in 95 Cal. 425, 30 Pac. Rep. 581, differs in no essential respect from that of McNulty, just considered. 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 959. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the writ of error must be dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
VINCENT v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 149 U.S. 648 (1893)
VINCENT
v.
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1,316.
May 15, 1893.
Page 149 U.S. 648, 649
W. H. H. Hart, Atty. Gen. Cal., for the motion.
Carroll Cook and G. R. B. Hayes, opposed.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.
This case, which will be found reported in 95 Cal. 425, 30 Pac. Rep. 581, differs in no essential respect from that of McNulty, just considered. 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 959. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the writ of error must be dismissed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
