EX PARTE RISER, 149 U.S. 191 (1893)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

EX PARTE RISER, 149 U.S. 191 (1893)

149 U.S. 191

Ex parte RISER.

Ex parte TYLER.

Ex parte GAINES.

Nos. 16, 18, 19, Original.

April 24, 1893

D. A. Townsend, Attorney General of South Carolina, J. Randolph Tucker, Sam'l Lord, and Ira B. Jones, for petitioners.

Henry Crawford and Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for respondents.

Page 149 U.S. 191, 192

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

The differences between the general facts in these cases and in that just considered are not controlling as to the result, and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case (13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 785) the applications for the writ of habeas corpus are severally denied.


U.S. Supreme Court

EX PARTE RISER, 149 U.S. 191 (1893)

 149 U.S. 191

Ex parte RISER.

Ex parte TYLER.

Ex parte GAINES.

Nos. 16, 18, 19, Original.

April 24, 1893

D. A. Townsend, Attorney General of South Carolina, J. Randolph Tucker, Sam'l Lord, and Ira B. Jones, for petitioners.

Henry Crawford and Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for respondents.

Page 149 U.S. 191, 192

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

The differences between the general facts in these cases and in that just considered are not controlling as to the result, and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case (13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 785) the applications for the writ of habeas corpus are severally denied.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.