BENDER v. PENNSYLVANIA CO, 148 U.S. 502 (1893)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

BENDER v. PENNSYLVANIA CO, 148 U.S. 502 (1893)

148 U.S. 502

BENDER
v.
PENNSYLVANIA CO.
No. 193.

April 3, 1893

Lyman R. Critchfield, for plaintiff in error.

J. R. Carey, for defendant in error.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

This is a writ of error, brought May 29, 1889, to an order overruling a motion to remand the case to the state court. Such an order is not a final judgment on the merits, and the writ of error must be dismissed. McLish v. Roff, 141 U.S. 661, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 118; Railway Co. v. Roberts, 141 U.S. 690, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123; Joy v. Adelbert College, 146 U.S. 355, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 186.


U.S. Supreme Court

BENDER v. PENNSYLVANIA CO, 148 U.S. 502 (1893)

148 U.S. 502

BENDER
v.
PENNSYLVANIA CO.
No. 193.

April 3, 1893

Lyman R. Critchfield, for plaintiff in error.

J. R. Carey, for defendant in error.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

This is a writ of error, brought May 29, 1889, to an order overruling a motion to remand the case to the state court. Such an order is not a final judgment on the merits, and the writ of error must be dismissed. McLish v. Roff, 141 U.S. 661, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 118; Railway Co. v. Roberts, 141 U.S. 690, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 123; Joy v. Adelbert College, 146 U.S. 355, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 186.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.