KEELS v. CENTRAL R CO OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 147 U.S. 374 (1893)

U.S. Supreme Court

KEELS v. CENTRAL R CO OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 147 U.S. 374 (1893)

147 U.S. 374

KEELS et al.
v.
CENTRAL R. CO. OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 1,207.

January 23, 1893

As the

Page 147 U.S. 374, 375

facts of this case are substantially the same as the one just decided, (13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 348,) the decision must be the same.

The decree of the court below will therefore be reversed, and the case remanded, with directions to dismiss the bill.

Samuel Lord and Ira B. Jones, for appellants.

J. T. Barron and Henry A. M. Smith, for appellee.

Mr. Justice BROWN.


U.S. Supreme Court

KEELS v. CENTRAL R CO OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 147 U.S. 374 (1893)

147 U.S. 374

KEELS et al.
v.
CENTRAL R. CO. OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 1,207.

January 23, 1893

As the

Page 147 U.S. 374, 375

facts of this case are substantially the same as the one just decided, (13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 348,) the decision must be the same.

The decree of the court below will therefore be reversed, and the case remanded, with directions to dismiss the bill.

Samuel Lord and Ira B. Jones, for appellants.

J. T. Barron and Henry A. M. Smith, for appellee.

Mr. Justice BROWN.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.