Brown v. Baxter, 146 U.S. 619 (1892)
U.S. Supreme Court
Brown v. Baxter, 146 U.S. 619 (1892)
Brown v. Baxter
No. 1123
Submitted December 12, 1892
Decided December 19, 1892
146 U.S. 619
Syllabus
A writ of error to the court of appeals of a state to review a judgment of that court dismissing an appeal and remanding the case for further proceedings in the state court below is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
This was an action begun and prosecuted to judgment in a circuit court of the Kentucky. From that judgment, appeal and cross-appeal were taken to the court of appeals of the state. That court, after hearing, ordered
"that said judgment be reversed on the original appeal and affirmed on the cross-appeal and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein, which is ordered to be certified to said court."
The case was brought here by writ of error, to review a federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
Brown v. Baxter, 146 U.S. 619 (1892)
Brown v. Baxter
No. 1123
Submitted December 12, 1892
Decided December 19, 1892
146 U.S. 619
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY
Syllabus
A writ of error to the court of appeals of a state to review a judgment of that court dismissing an appeal and remanding the case for further proceedings in the state court below is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
This was an action begun and prosecuted to judgment in a circuit court of the Kentucky. From that judgment, appeal and cross-appeal were taken to the court of appeals of the state. That court, after hearing, ordered
"that said judgment be reversed on the original appeal and affirmed on the cross-appeal and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein, which is ordered to be certified to said court."
The case was brought here by writ of error, to review a federal question.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The writ of error is dismissed upon the authority of Meagher v. Minnesota Co., 145 U. S. 608; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197; Johnson v. Keith, 117 U. S. 199.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
