CLUETT v. MCNEANY, 140 U.S. 183 (1891)
U.S. Supreme Court
CLUETT v. MCNEANY, 140 U.S. 183 (1891)
140 U.S. 183
CLUETT et al.
v.
McNEANY et al.
May 11, 1891
Saml. A. Duncan and James A. Skilton, for appellants.
David Tim, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
As this case also turns upon the validity of the same patent, (Cluett v. Claflin, ante, 725,) the decree of the court below is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CLUETT v. MCNEANY, 140 U.S. 183 (1891)
CLUETT et al.
v.
McNEANY et al.
May 11, 1891
Saml. A. Duncan and James A. Skilton, for appellants.
Page 140 U.S. 183, 184
David Tim, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
As this case also turns upon the validity of the same patent, (Cluett v. Claflin, ante, 725,) the decree of the court below is affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.