CLUETT v. MCNEANY, 140 U.S. 183 (1891)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

CLUETT v. MCNEANY, 140 U.S. 183 (1891)

140 U.S. 183

CLUETT et al.
v.
McNEANY et al.

May 11, 1891

Saml. A. Duncan and James A. Skilton, for appellants.

Page 140 U.S. 183, 184

David Tim, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

As this case also turns upon the validity of the same patent, (Cluett v. Claflin, ante, 725,) the decree of the court below is affirmed.


U.S. Supreme Court

CLUETT v. MCNEANY, 140 U.S. 183 (1891)

 140 U.S. 183

CLUETT et al.
v.
McNEANY et al.

May 11, 1891

Saml. A. Duncan and James A. Skilton, for appellants.

Page 140 U.S. 183, 184

David Tim, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

As this case also turns upon the validity of the same patent, (Cluett v. Claflin, ante, 725,) the decree of the court below is affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.