ELECTRIC GAS-LIGHTING CO v. TILLOTSON, 139 U.S. 503 (1891)

U.S. Supreme Court

ELECTRIC GAS-LIGHTING CO v. TILLOTSON, 139 U.S. 503 (1891)

139 U.S. 503

ELECTRIC GAS LIGHTING CO.
v.
TILLOTSON et al.
No. 235.

April 6, 1891.

Page 139 U.S. 503, 504

Edwin H. Brown, for appellant

E. N. Dickerson, for appellees.

BLATCHFORD, J.

This suit is founded upon the same reissue, No. 9,743, considered in Electric Gas-Lighting Co. v. Boston Electric Co., ante, 586, (just decided .) The case was heard by Judge WHEELER, who dismissed the bill, holding that claims 2 and 5 of the reissue were invalid. 21 Fed. Rep. 568. It having been stipulated that, if the decree in No. 232 is affirmed, to decree in No. 235 shall be affirmed without costs to the appellees, and the decree in No. 232 having been affirmed, the decree in No. 235 is affirmed, without costs to the appellees.


U.S. Supreme Court

ELECTRIC GAS-LIGHTING CO v. TILLOTSON, 139 U.S. 503 (1891)

 139 U.S. 503

ELECTRIC GAS LIGHTING CO.
v.
TILLOTSON et al.
No. 235.

April 6, 1891.

Page 139 U.S. 503, 504

Edwin H. Brown, for appellant

E. N. Dickerson, for appellees.

BLATCHFORD, J.

This suit is founded upon the same reissue, No. 9,743, considered in Electric Gas-Lighting Co. v. Boston Electric Co., ante, 586, (just decided .) The case was heard by Judge WHEELER, who dismissed the bill, holding that claims 2 and 5 of the reissue were invalid. 21 Fed. Rep. 568. It having been stipulated that, if the decree in No. 232 is affirmed, to decree in No. 235 shall be affirmed without costs to the appellees, and the decree in No. 232 having been affirmed, the decree in No. 235 is affirmed, without costs to the appellees.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.