Washington Market Co. v. District of Columbia, 137 U.S. 62 (1890)

U.S. Supreme Court

Washington Market Co. v. District of Columbia, 137 U.S. 62 (1890)

Washington Market Company v. District of Columbia

No. 10

Submitted October 21, 1890

Decided October 27, 1890

137 U.S. 62

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Syllabus

The Court dismisses without costs to either party an appeal, the subject matter of which has been settled elsewhere, leaving only the disposition of costs involved.

In equity. The case is stated in the opinion.

U.S. Supreme Court

Washington Market Co. v. District of Columbia, 137 U.S. 62 (1890)

Washington Market Company v. District of Columbia

No. 10

Submitted October 21, 1890

Decided October 27, 1890

137 U.S. 62

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Syllabus

The Court dismisses without costs to either party an appeal, the subject matter of which has been settled elsewhere, leaving only the disposition of costs involved.

In equity. The case is stated in the opinion.

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia dismissing the bill of

Page 137 U. S. 63

complaint filed by appellant therein, the object of the bill having been to restrain the defendants from selling or attempting to sell certain property of complainant on account of certain assessments for street improvements, and also to cancel and annul two tax lien certificates therein named, and, counsel for appellant having stated in open court that such assessments and lien certificates have been, pending this appeal, quashed and annulled at law by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, and that only the disposition of costs is involved herein, it is ordered that said appeal be

Dismissed without costs to either party.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.