PENNSYLVANIA CO, EX PARTE, 137 U.S. 457 (1890)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

PENNSYLVANIA CO, EX PARTE, 137 U.S. 457 (1890)

137 U.S. 457

Ex parte PENNSYLVANIA CO.

December 8, 1890.

Page 137 U.S. 457, 458

Danl. Davenport and William H. O'Hara, for petitioner.

Lewis E. Stanton, for respondent.

BRADLEY, J.

This case in all material respects is identical with the case of Ex parte Pennsylvania Co., ante, 141, (just decided,) and the same conclusion is reached as in that case. The petition for mandamus is denied.


U.S. Supreme Court

PENNSYLVANIA CO, EX PARTE, 137 U.S. 457 (1890)

 137 U.S. 457

Ex parte PENNSYLVANIA CO.

December 8, 1890.

Page 137 U.S. 457, 458

Danl. Davenport and William H. O'Hara, for petitioner.

Lewis E. Stanton, for respondent.

BRADLEY, J.

This case in all material respects is identical with the case of Ex parte Pennsylvania Co., ante, 141, (just decided,) and the same conclusion is reached as in that case. The petition for mandamus is denied.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.