SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890)

137 U.S. 224

SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES.

KEY
v.
SAME.

November 24, 1890

Archibald Stirling, Jr., E. J. Waring, and John Henry Keene, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Atty. Gen. Miller, for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

No. 1,142, (Smith v. U. S.,) and No. 1,144, (Key v. Same,) argued and decided at the same time, are substantially similar, and in those cases also the judgments are affirmed.


U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890)

137 U.S. 224

SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES.

KEY
v.
SAME.

November 24, 1890

Archibald Stirling, Jr., E. J. Waring, and John Henry Keene, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Atty. Gen. Miller, for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

No. 1,142, (Smith v. U. S.,) and No. 1,144, (Key v. Same,) argued and decided at the same time, are substantially similar, and in those cases also the judgments are affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.