SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890)137 U.S. 224
SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES.
KEY
v.
SAME.
November 24, 1890
Archibald Stirling, Jr., E. J. Waring, and John Henry Keene, Jr., for plaintiff in error.
Atty. Gen. Miller, for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
No. 1,142, (Smith v. U. S.,) and No. 1,144, (Key v. Same,)
argued and decided at the same time, are substantially similar, and
in those cases also the judgments are affirmed.
Opinions
v.
UNITED STATES. KEY
v.
SAME. November 24, 1890 Archibald Stirling, Jr., E. J. Waring, and John Henry Keene, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Atty. Gen. Miller, for the United States. PER CURIAM. No. 1,142, (Smith v. U. S.,) and No. 1,144, (Key v. Same,) argued and decided at the same time, are substantially similar, and in those cases also the judgments are affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890) 137 U.S. 224 SMITHv.
UNITED STATES. KEY
v.
SAME. November 24, 1890 Archibald Stirling, Jr., E. J. Waring, and John Henry Keene, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Atty. Gen. Miller, for the United States. PER CURIAM. No. 1,142, (Smith v. U. S.,) and No. 1,144, (Key v. Same,) argued and decided at the same time, are substantially similar, and in those cases also the judgments are affirmed.
Search This Case
