SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890)
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890)
137 U.S. 224
SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES.
KEY
v.
SAME.
November 24, 1890
Archibald Stirling, Jr., E. J. Waring, and John Henry Keene, Jr., for plaintiff in error.
Atty. Gen. Miller, for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
No. 1,142, (Smith v. U. S.,) and No. 1,144, (Key v. Same,) argued and decided at the same time, are substantially similar, and in those cases also the judgments are affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890)
SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES.
KEY
v.
SAME.
November 24, 1890
Archibald Stirling, Jr., E. J. Waring, and John Henry Keene, Jr., for plaintiff in error.
Atty. Gen. Miller, for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
No. 1,142, (Smith v. U. S.,) and No. 1,144, (Key v. Same,) argued and decided at the same time, are substantially similar, and in those cases also the judgments are affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.