Toledo, D. & B. R. Co. v. Hamilton,
134 U.S. 296 (1890)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Toledo, D. & B. R. Co. v. Hamilton, 134 U.S. 296 (1890)

Toledo, Delphos and Burlington Railroad Company v. Hamilton

No. 184

Argued January 10, 1890

Decided March 17, 1890

134 U.S. 296


A recorded mortgage, given by a railroad company on its roadbed and other property, creates a lien whose priority cannot be displaced thereafter either directly by a mortgage given by the company or indirectly by a contract between the company and a third party for the erection of buildings or other works of original construction.

Whether a mechanic's lien could, under the statutes of Ohio in force at the time of the attempted filing of a lien in this case, be placed upon a railroad, quaere.

The priority of a mortgage debt upon a railroad has been sometimes displaced in favor of unsecured creditors when those debts were contracted for keeping up a railroad, already built, as a going concern, but those cases have no application to a debt contracted for original construction.

A mortgage with words of general description conveys land held by a full equitable title as well as that held by a legal title.

In equity. The case is stated in the opinion.

Page 134 U. S. 297

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.