Marshall v. United States, 131 U.S. 391 (1888)

U.S. Supreme Court

Marshall v. United States, 131 U.S. 391 (1888)

Marshall v. United States

No. 57

Argued November 1, 1888

Decided November 19, 1888

131 U.S. 391

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS

Syllabus

Marshall v. United States, 124 U. S. 391, is affirmed on rehearing.

This case was heard at October Term 1887, and the judgment below was affirmed. 124 U. S. 124 U.S. 391. A petition for rehearing was granted April 30, 1888, 127 U.S. 786, and the cause was reargued at this term.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, on the 19th of November, 1888, announced that a majority of the Court adhered to the views expressed by MR. JUSTICE HARLAN in the opinion of the Court in this case delivered at the last term, affirming the judgment of the Court of Claims.

U.S. Supreme Court

Marshall v. United States, 131 U.S. 391 (1888)

Marshall v. United States

No. 57

Argued November 1, 1888

Decided November 19, 1888

131 U.S. 391

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS

Syllabus

Marshall v. United States, 124 U. S. 391, is affirmed on rehearing.

This case was heard at October Term 1887, and the judgment below was affirmed. 124 U. S. 124 U.S. 391. A petition for rehearing was granted April 30, 1888, 127 U.S. 786, and the cause was reargued at this term.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, on the 19th of November, 1888, announced that a majority of the Court adhered to the views expressed by MR. JUSTICE HARLAN in the opinion of the Court in this case delivered at the last term, affirming the judgment of the Court of Claims.

Affirmed.

Page 131 U. S. 392

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN stated that he now believed that that opinion was wrong, and that he dissented from the judgment of the Court.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.