Wallace v. Johnstone,
129 U.S. 58 (1889)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Wallace v. Johnstone, 129 U.S. 58 (1889)

Wallace v. Johnstone

No. 94

Argued November 23, 1888

Decided January 14, 1889

129 U.S. 58


A deed of lands, absolute in form, with general warranty of title and an agreement by the vendee to reconvey the property to the vendor or to a third person, upon his payment of a fixed sum within a specified time, do not of themselves constitute a mortgage; nor will they be held to operate as a mortgage unless it is clearly shown, either by parol evidence or by the attendant circumstances, such as the condition and relation of the parties or gross inadequacy of price, to have been intended by the parties as a security for a loan or an existing debt.

The fact of a collateral agreement by the grantee in a deed of real estate to reconvey to the grantor on the payment of a sum of money at a future day is not inconsistent with the idea of a sale.

Whether the transaction in dispute was a sale or a mortgage is a question of fact, to be determined from the proof, and here the proof shows it to have been a sale.

The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

Page 129 U. S. 59

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.