Pacific Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. O'Connor
128 U.S. 394 (1888)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
Pacific Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. O'Connor, 128 U.S. 394 (1888)
Pacific Postal Telegraph Cable Company v. O'Connor
No. 1282
Submitted November 12, 1888
Decided November 19, 1888
128 U.S. 394
Syllabus
A remittitur, in a judgment on a verdict, of all sums in excess of $5,000, made on the day following entry of the judgment on motion of plaintiff's counsel in the absence of defendant or his counsel, is no abuse of the discretion of the court.
Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The case is stated in the opinion.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
