GAFF v. GOTTFRIED, 128 U.S. 170 (1888)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

GAFF v. GOTTFRIED, 128 U.S. 170 (1888)

128 U.S. 170

GAFF et al.
v.
GOTTFRIED.

HACK et al.
v.
SAME.

November 5, 1888

R. H. Parkinson, for appellant.

E. Banning and T. A. Banning, for appellee.

BLATCHFORD, J.

These are appeals by the defendants in two suits brought by Matthew Gottfried, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana, upon the same patent involved in the case of Brewing Co. v. Gottfried, ante, 83, (just decided.) The proofs are the same as in that case, and the same conclusions are reached. The decree in each case is reversed, and each case is remanded to the circuit court, with a direction to dismiss the bill of complaint, with costs.


U.S. Supreme Court

GAFF v. GOTTFRIED, 128 U.S. 170 (1888)

128 U.S. 170

GAFF et al.
v.
GOTTFRIED.

HACK et al.
v.
SAME.

November 5, 1888

R. H. Parkinson, for appellant.

E. Banning and T. A. Banning, for appellee.

BLATCHFORD, J.

These are appeals by the defendants in two suits brought by Matthew Gottfried, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana, upon the same patent involved in the case of Brewing Co. v. Gottfried, ante, 83, (just decided.) The proofs are the same as in that case, and the same conclusions are reached. The decree in each case is reversed, and each case is remanded to the circuit court, with a direction to dismiss the bill of complaint, with costs.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.