Seagrist v. Crabtree, 127 U.S. 773 (1888)
U.S. Supreme Court
Seagrist v. Crabtree, 127 U.S. 773 (1888)Seagrist v. Crabtree
No. 386
Submitted April 9, 1888
Decided April 18, 1888
127 U.S. 773
Syllabus
It is not sufficient cause for dismissing a writ of error that the citation was served and made returnable less than thirty days after the writ was granted.
Motion to dismiss "because the citation was not served in time."
U.S. Supreme Court
Seagrist v. Crabtree, 127 U.S. 773 (1888)Seagrist v. Crabtree
No. 386
Submitted April 9, 1888
Decided April 18, 1888
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO
Syllabus
It is not sufficient cause for dismissing a writ of error that the citation was served and made returnable less than thirty days after the writ was granted.
Motion to dismiss "because the citation was not served in time."
MR. JUSTICE MILLER: This is a motion to dismiss, the ground for which is that the citation was served and made returnable less than thirty days after the writ was granted. We do not think that is a sufficient ground to dismiss the writ of error, whatever may be the ground for relief.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
