Shreveport v. Holmes, 125 U.S. 694 (1887)

U.S. Supreme Court

Shreveport v. Holmes, 125 U.S. 694 (1888)

Shreveport v. Holmes

Nos. 1121-1123

Submitted October 17, 1887

Decided November 14, 1887

Rehearing refused January 9, 1888

125 U.S. 694

Syllabus

A petition for a rehearing of a case decided by a divided Court is denied on the ground that no important constitutional question is involved.

These cases, which were all submitted together, were all affirmed by a divided Court on the 14th day of November, 1887. The plaintiff in error petitioned for a rehearing, citing Home Ins. Co. v. New York, 119 U. S. 129.

U.S. Supreme Court

Shreveport v. Holmes, 125 U.S. 694 (1888)

Shreveport v. Holmes

Nos. 1121-1123

Submitted October 17, 1887

Decided November 14, 1887

Rehearing refused January 9, 1888

125 U.S. 694

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Syllabus

A petition for a rehearing of a case decided by a divided Court is denied on the ground that no important constitutional question is involved.

These cases, which were all submitted together, were all affirmed by a divided Court on the 14th day of November, 1887. The plaintiff in error petitioned for a rehearing, citing Home Ins. Co. v. New York, 119 U. S. 129.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

These petitions are denied. The rehearing was granted in Home Insurance Co. v. New York, 119 U. S. 129, after a decision by a divided Court, because an important constitutional question was involved. The questions in these cases are not of that character.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.