Munson v. Mayor of City of New York
Annotate this Case
124 U.S. 601 (1888)
- Syllabus |
U.S. Supreme Court
Munson v. Mayor of City of New York, 124 U.S. 601 (1888)
Munson v. Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the of City of New York
Argued February 2-3, 1888
Decided February 13, 1888
124 U.S. 601
A blank book, with pages numbered and ruled into spaces, in which bonds and their coupons, on being presented and paid, may be pasted in the order of their numbers -- the bonds on successive pages, and each bond and its coupons on the same page -- or, when any bond or coupon is paid without being surrendered, memoranda concerning it may be made, if under any circumstances a patentable invention, is not so if similar books have been in use before, differing only in grouping the coupons according to their dates of payment, and in having no spaces for the bonds.
This was a bill in equity by Francis Munson against the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York and the comptroller of the city for the infringement of letters patent granted to Munson on April 2, 1867, for "new and useful improvements in preserving, filing and cancelling bonds, coupons, certificates of stock &c.," consisting, as described in the specification,
"in providing a book or other register with pages corresponding in size, style and number with the bonds, coupons, certificates &c., to be used, on which pages the said bonds, coupons, or other certificates, when paid, are pasted or otherwise attached, and thus preserved and cancelled, as hereinafter more fully explained."
The specification then, after observing that bonds and coupons, when paid, are usually either filed away or destroyed, and that, before or after being paid, they are often lost or stolen, by which the community is constantly being defrauded more or less, proceeded as follows:
"To prevent this, I have invented a system of preserving, filing and cancelling such
documents, which system will not only prevent such fraudulent practices but also present at all tunes a full and perfect history or record of all transactions in relation to each and all of said documents. To accomplish this, I provide a book or set of books having each page printed or ruled to correspond in size and style with the bond and its coupons or other document, whatever it may be, with a heading showing the number, date when issued, to whom issued, when and where payable, amount, what issued for, rate of interest and when and where payable, together with such other facts as may be necessary to form a perfect record of the document. The pages are numbered consecutively with the numbers corresponding to the numbers on the bonds or other documents. When any of the coupons are presented and paid, they are cancelled and then pasted or otherwise secured in their proper place upon the page, each place for them being numbered. When the bond itself is paid, it is likewise attached in the place on the page provided for it. If the holder should by any means be dispossessed of one or more of the coupons or bonds, upon presentation of the proper evidence, he would be paid, but not having the coupon or bond to surrender, there would be entered in its place upon the page a record of the facts in the case, so that if at any future time said coupon or bond should be presented for payment by a person not entitled to it, the record of all the facts relating to it would be ready at hand, and could be referred to at once by examining the proper page. By this method of arranging them, the number is always an index, so that if it is desired at any time to ascertain any fact in relation to any particular bond or its coupons, it is only necessary to turn to the page having, the same number. In case a large series of bonds or certificates are used, several books would be required, and in that case the pages of each succeeding book would commence with the number next following that of the last page of the preceding volume, so as to make the numbers of the pages continuous from the beginning of the first book to the ending of the last. It will, of course, be understood that each separate set or series of bonds, certificates of stock, or other similar documents
will require a set of books specially prepared for them to correspond with the peculiar character of the document, the system or general plan, however, being the same in all cases, the details only being varied to suit the circumstances of the case."
The patentee claimed as his invention:
"1. The preserving, filing and verifying of bonds, coupons, certificates and all similar documents, by the means and in the manner substantially as herein set forth."
"2. The book or register, constructed and used as and for the purposes set forth."
The defenses set up in the answer were that the plaintiff was not the first and original inventor of the alleged improvement; that long before his alleged invention, it was known to and used by William E. Warren and three other persons named, all residing in the City of New York; that the defendants had made no profits from its use, and that it was not patentable. The plaintiff filed a general replication.
By the evidence taken in the case, it appeared that from 1872 there had been used, in the office of the Comptroller of the City of New York, books like those described in the plaintiff's patent, except that the coupons were pasted on each alternate page and the bond on the opposite page, and that as early as 1853, Warren devised and used books for preserving the coupons of a railroad company, in which all the coupons payable on the same date were pasted in succession in the order of the numbers of the bonds to which they belonged, in ruled spaces of the proper size, above which the numbers of the coupons and of the bonds had been previously written or printed, and with a description of the bonds and the date of payment of the coupons written at the beginning of each series of coupons payable at the same date, but the bonds themselves were not pasted in, except a single one at the beginning of each book.
Upon the pleadings and proofs, the circuit court held that the plaintiff was the first and original inventor of the improvement, and that the patent was valid, and entered an interlocutory decree in his favor for an injunction and an account. 18 Blatchford 237. The case was then referred to a master,
who reported that upon the evidence taken before him (which need not be stated) the plaintiff was entitled to recover the sum of $6,202.40 as profits. Exceptions taken by the defendants to his report were sustained. 21 Blatchford, 342. A final decree was entered awarding to the plaintiff the sum of six cents damages and ordering that the costs before the interlocutory decree be paid by the defendant, and the costs since that decree by the plaintiff. Both parties appealed to this Court.