U S v. ALABAMA, 123 U.S. 39 (1887)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

U S v. ALABAMA, 123 U.S. 39 (1887)

123 U.S. 39

UNITED STATES
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA.

UNITED STATES
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI.

October 24, 1887

Atty. Gen. Garland, for appellant.

Van H. Manning, for appellee.

FIELD, J.

The questions presented in these cases are covered by the decision in the case of U. S. v. Louisiana, ante, 17, and, in conformity with it, the judgments in them must be affirmed. So ordered.


U.S. Supreme Court

U S v. ALABAMA, 123 U.S. 39 (1887)

123 U.S. 39

UNITED STATES
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA.

UNITED STATES
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI.

October 24, 1887

Atty. Gen. Garland, for appellant.

Van H. Manning, for appellee.

FIELD, J.

The questions presented in these cases are covered by the decision in the case of U. S. v. Louisiana, ante, 17, and, in conformity with it, the judgments in them must be affirmed. So ordered.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.