Pensacola Ice Co. v. Perry, 120 U.S. 318 (1887)

U.S. Supreme Court

Pensacola Ice Co. v. Perry, 120 U.S. 318 (1887)

Pensacola Ice Company v. Perry

Submitted December 20, 1886

Decided February 7, 1887

120 U.S. 318

Syllabus

It appearing by the record in this Court that the verdict at the trial of an action of ejectment in the Circuit Court of the United States sitting in Florida did not state the quantity of the estate or describe the land, the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

U.S. Supreme Court

Pensacola Ice Co. v. Perry, 120 U.S. 318 (1887)

Pensacola Ice Company v. Perry

Submitted December 20, 1886

Decided February 7, 1887

120 U.S. 318

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Syllabus

It appearing by the record in this Court that the verdict at the trial of an action of ejectment in the Circuit Court of the United States sitting in Florida did not state the quantity of the estate or describe the land, the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Page 120 U. S. 319

A statute of Florida, approved February 22, 1881, contains the following provisions:

"SEC. 1. The verdict in actions of ejectment shall, when for the plaintiff, state the quantity of the estate of the plaintiff and describe the land by its metes and bounds, by the number of the lot, or other certain description."

"SEC. 2. The judgment awarding possession shall in like manner state the quantity of the estate and give description of the land recovered."

This was an action of ejectment, and the verdict, which was for the plaintiff, did not state the quantity of the estate or describe the land. This is assigned for error, among others, and Perry, the defendant in error, in the brief which has been filed in his behalf, confesses that the judgment in his favor is thereby vitiated. Without considering any of the other errors assigned, therefore, we reverse the judgment on this ground alone, and remand the cause for a new trial.

Reversed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.