Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co., 115 U.S. 221 (1885)

U.S. Supreme Court

Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co., 115 U.S. 221 (1885)

Boston Mining Company v. Eagle Mining Company

Submitted October 22, 1885

Decided October 2, 1885

115 U.S. 221

Syllabus

There being no assignment of error or appearance for plaintiff in error, judgment below is affirmed on motion of defendant in error, without examining the record.

The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

U.S. Supreme Court

Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co., 115 U.S. 221 (1885)

Boston Mining Company v. Eagle Mining Company

Submitted October 22, 1885

Decided October 2, 1885

115 U.S. 221

I

N ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Syllabus

There being no assignment of error or appearance for plaintiff in error, judgment below is affirmed on motion of defendant in error, without examining the record.

The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

When this cause was reached on the call of the docket, it was submitted by the defendant in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by § 997, Rev.Stat. At the last term, the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We therefore affirm the judgment without opening the record.

Affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.