Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co., 115 U.S. 221 (1885)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co., 115 U.S. 221 (1885)Boston Mining Company v. Eagle Mining Company
Submitted October 22, 1885
Decided October 2, 1885
115 U.S. 221
Syllabus
There being no assignment of error or appearance for plaintiff in error, judgment below is affirmed on motion of defendant in error, without examining the record.
The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.
Opinions
STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Syllabus There being no assignment of error or appearance for plaintiff in error, judgment below is affirmed on motion of defendant in error, without examining the record. The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the Court. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. When this cause was reached on the call of the docket, it was submitted by the defendant in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by ยง 997, Rev.Stat. At the last term, the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We therefore affirm the judgment without opening the record. Affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co., 115 U.S. 221 (1885) Boston Mining Company v. Eagle Mining Company Submitted October 22, 1885 Decided October 2, 1885 115 U.S. 221 I N ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITEDSTATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Syllabus There being no assignment of error or appearance for plaintiff in error, judgment below is affirmed on motion of defendant in error, without examining the record. The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the Court. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. When this cause was reached on the call of the docket, it was submitted by the defendant in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by ยง 997, Rev.Stat. At the last term, the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We therefore affirm the judgment without opening the record. Affirmed.
Search This Case
