GREENHOOD v. RANDALL, 111 U.S. 775 (1884)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

GREENHOOD v. RANDALL, 111 U.S. 775 (1884)

111 U.S. 775

GREENHOOD and others
v.
RANDALL.

May 5, 1884

Edwin W. Toole, for plaintiff in error.

S. Shellabarger and J. M. Wilson, for defendant in error.

WAITE, C. J.

This judgment is affirmed. The record fails entirely to present in proper form any of the questions which have been argued for the plaintiff in error. Affirmed.


U.S. Supreme Court

GREENHOOD v. RANDALL, 111 U.S. 775 (1884)

 111 U.S. 775

GREENHOOD and others
v.
RANDALL.

May 5, 1884

Edwin W. Toole, for plaintiff in error.

S. Shellabarger and J. M. Wilson, for defendant in error.

WAITE, C. J.

This judgment is affirmed. The record fails entirely to present in proper form any of the questions which have been argued for the plaintiff in error. Affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.