Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Company,
110 U.S. 174 (1884)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Company, 110 U.S. 174 (1884)

Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Company

Submitted January 4, 1884

Decided January 21, 1884

110 U.S. 174


1. A verdict was taken, subject to the opinion of the court, upon a case to be made, with liberty to either party to turn the case into a bill of exceptions. A case was made setting forth the entire evidence at the trial, but it was not made an agreed statement of facts, nor were exceptions taken, nor was any finding of facts made. Held that there was no basis for the assignment of errors.

2. A plaintiff obtained a verdict against the United States in the court below, subject to the opinion of the court on a case to be made, and then rested nearly thirty years before entry of judgment. Held that under these

circumstances, interest should run only from the entry of the judgment.

3. Interest is recoverable of right when it is reserved in the contract, but when it is given as damages, it is within the discretion of the court to allow or disallow it, and it will not be allowed if the plaintiff has been guilty of laches in unreasonably delaying the prosecution of his claim.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.