ST. LOUIS SMELTING & REFINING CO. v. RAY
104 U.S. 657 (1881)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
ST. LOUIS SMELTING & REFINING CO. v. RAY, 104 U.S. 657 (1881)
104 U.S. 657 104 U.S. 657
St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.
v.
RAY
October Term, 1881
NOTE.-Smelting Company v. Ray, error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado, was argued at the same time as the preceding case, and by the same counsel for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Thomas M. Patterson for the defendants in error.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD remarked that, as it presented the same questions there determined, the judgment of the court below must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissented.[ St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Ray 104 U.S. 657 (1881) ]
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
