Vigel v. Hopp,
104 U.S. 441 (1881)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Vigel v. Hopp, 104 U.S. 441 (1881)

Vigel v. Hopp

104 U.S. 441


Where the answer is responsive to the allegations of the complainant's bill, they must, to entitle him to relief, be sustained by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness corroborated by circumstances which are equivalent in weight to the testimony of another witness.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.