Ohio v. Frank,
103 U.S. 697 (1880)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Ohio v. Frank, 103 U.S. 697 (1880)

Ohio v. Frank

103 U.S. 697


1. The rulings in Walnut v. Wade, supra, p. 103 U. S. 683, reaffirmed.

2. The Court enforces the ruling of the Supreme Court of Illinois that a note given in that state for a sum of money at a stipulated rate of interest not exceeding ten percent per annum bears that rate as long as the principal remains unpaid.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.