Tintsman v. National Bank,
100 U.S. 6 (1879)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Tintsman v. National Bank, 100 U.S. 6 (1879)

Tintsman v. National Bank

100 U.S. 6


Where, by an agreed statement of facts in the nature of a special verdict, the plaintiff's claim was admitted by the defendant, except the sum of $3,134.20, held that that sum was the amount actually in dispute, and although judgment was rendered below for the entire claim, being more than $5,000, the writ of error must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.