1 U.S. 94 (1784)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

HIGHT v. WILSON, 1 U.S. 94 (1784)

1 U.S. 94 (Dall.)


Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

September Term, 1784

This was a signed issue to try the validity of a will, against the probate of which, a caveat had been entered in the Register's Office. The plea was insanity in the testator; and evidence was given of habitual drunkenness, old age, weakness of body, shortness of memory, and a few incoherent expressions. The jury however, in a very short time, gave a verdict for the plaintiff in the issue, who was the devisee in the will.

The Chief Justice, in his charge to the jury, informed them, 1st. That it was not necessary that a will, devising real estate in this Commonwealth, should be sealed. 2nd. Nor that all the subscribing witnesses should prove the execution. 3rd. Nor that the proof of the will should be made by those who subscribed as witnesses. 4th. Nor that the will should be subscribed by the witnesses.*


[Footnote *] See post Lewis Appellant versus Marle Appellant.[ Hight v. Wilson

Footnote 1 U.S. 94 (1784) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.