KEPPELE v. WILLIAMS, 1 U.S. 29 (1776)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

KEPPELE v. WILLIAMS, 1 U.S. 29 (1776)

1 U.S. 29 (Dall.)

Keppele
v.
Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

April Term, 1776

A Venire had issued, and the Jury was summoned: the Plaintiff forbade the Sheriff to bring the Jury to the Court. On the day of trial, the Plaintiff's Attorney demanded the Venire. Defendant's Attorney opposed it, and advised the Sheriff to deliver it into Court.

The Jury also attended upon the application of Defendant's Attorney. The Court was then moved for their direction.

They took the Venire and called for the pannell. The CHIEF JUSTICE quoting the following authorities, to show, that it would be a contempt to pocket the Venire. Comb. 303. 4 Mod. 367. Vin. Abr. Tit. Trial 329.

The Plaintiff then moved to continue the cause which was allowed, Defendant having no proviso rule.

Defendant then moved for a proviso rule, to which Plaintiff objected, and made affidavit of the absence of a material witness, and service of a subpoena, on which the motion dropt.[ Keppele v. Williams 1 U.S. 29 (1776)


U.S. Supreme Court

KEPPELE v. WILLIAMS, 1 U.S. 29 (1776)

1 U.S. 29 (Dall.)

Keppele
v.
Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

April Term, 1776

A Venire had issued, and the Jury was summoned: the Plaintiff forbade the Sheriff to bring the Jury to the Court. On the day of trial, the Plaintiff's Attorney demanded the Venire. Defendant's Attorney opposed it, and advised the Sheriff to deliver it into Court.

The Jury also attended upon the application of Defendant's Attorney. The Court was then moved for their direction.

They took the Venire and called for the pannell. The CHIEF JUSTICE quoting the following authorities, to show, that it would be a contempt to pocket the Venire. Comb. 303. 4 Mod. 367. Vin. Abr. Tit. Trial 329.

The Plaintiff then moved to continue the cause which was allowed, Defendant having no proviso rule.

Defendant then moved for a proviso rule, to which Plaintiff objected, and made affidavit of the absence of a material witness, and service of a subpoena, on which the motion dropt.[ Keppele v. Williams 1 U.S. 29 (1776)

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.