SHOTWELL v. BOEHM, 1 U.S. 172 (1786)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SHOTWELL v. BOEHM, 1 U.S. 172 (1786)

1 U.S. 172 (Dall.)

Shotwell
v.
Boehm

Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

June Term, 1786

Trespass for mesne profits, after recovery in Ejectment.

It was ruled by THE COURT, that the Plaintiff shall not give evidence of the annual value of the premises beyond the time of the lease mentioned in the declaration in ejectment; although the present action was brought by the lessor of the Plaintiff.

Rawle for the Plaintiff. Sergeant for the Defendant.[ Shotwell v. Boehm 1 U.S. 172 (1786) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

SHOTWELL v. BOEHM, 1 U.S. 172 (1786)

 1 U.S. 172 (Dall.)

Shotwell
v.
Boehm

Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

June Term, 1786

Trespass for mesne profits, after recovery in Ejectment.

It was ruled by THE COURT, that the Plaintiff shall not give evidence of the annual value of the premises beyond the time of the lease mentioned in the declaration in ejectment; although the present action was brought by the lessor of the Plaintiff.

Rawle for the Plaintiff. Sergeant for the Defendant.[ Shotwell v. Boehm 1 U.S. 172 (1786) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.