RICHE AND RICHARDS v. BROADFIELD, 1 U.S. 16 (1768)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations

Annotation

Primary Holding

For a mercantile dispute, the court will accept as evidence a document that is usually admitted as proof of a foreign transaction instead of requiring that a business agent be summoned to testify in court.
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

RICHE AND RICHARDS v. BROADFIELD , 1 U.S. 16 (1768)

1 U.S. 16 (Dall.)

Riche and Richards
v.
Broadfield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

April Term, 1768

An Account of Sales of an Adventure shipped to New York, said to be signed by the Factor, offered in evidence to prove a loss on the Goods. Objected, that the Factor himself ought to have been brought to give evidence, viva voce, or at least the account should have been proved by him, and certified under the City Seal of New York, agreeably, to the directions of the act of parliament with regard to the proving Colony debts in England. Answered, That this being a Mercantile Transaction, such Evidence as Merchants usualy admit as proofs of a foreign Transaction, should be received here. [ Riche and Richards v. Broadfield 1 U.S. 16 (1768)

BY THE COURT. The strict Rules of Law with regard to Evidence ought not to be extended to Mercantile Transactions. In this Case, on proving the hand Writing of the Factor, let the Account of Sales be given in Evidence; which was accordingly done.


U.S. Supreme Court

RICHE AND RICHARDS v. BROADFIELD , 1 U.S. 16 (1768)

1 U.S. 16 (Dall.)

Riche and Richards
v.
Broadfield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

April Term, 1768

An Account of Sales of an Adventure shipped to New York, said to be signed by the Factor, offered in evidence to prove a loss on the Goods. Objected, that the Factor himself ought to have been brought to give evidence, viva voce, or at least the account should have been proved by him, and certified under the City Seal of New York, agreeably, to the directions of the act of parliament with regard to the proving Colony debts in England. Answered, That this being a Mercantile Transaction, such Evidence as Merchants usualy admit as proofs of a foreign Transaction, should be received here. [ Riche and Richards v. Broadfield 1 U.S. 16 (1768)

BY THE COURT. The strict Rules of Law with regard to Evidence ought not to be extended to Mercantile Transactions. In this Case, on proving the hand Writing of the Factor, let the Account of Sales be given in Evidence; which was accordingly done.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.