WILSON'S LESSEE v. CAMPBELL, 1 U.S. 126 (1785)

U.S. Supreme Court

WILSON'S LESSEE v. CAMPBELL, 1 U.S. 126 (1785)

1 U.S. 126 (Dall.)

Wilson's Lessee
v.
Campbell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

April Term, 1785

Ejectment. Yeates, for the defendant, when called upon at the trial to consels Lease, Entry and Ouster, confessed Lease, Entry, and Ouster for part only of the tenements laid in the declaration.

This was opposed by Bradford, who contended, that the defendant having taken general defence, when he first pleaded, and entered into the common rule, he must now confess Lease, Entry and Ouster as to the whole; but the plaintiff can recover no more than he proves the defendant to be in possession of. 1 Att. Prac. 317.

By the Court: The defendant must in this case, confess Lease, Entry, and Ouster for the whole tenements laid in the declaration.*

Footnotes

[Footnote *] This case was determined at N.P. Carlisle on the 16 May, 1785, before McKean, Chief Justice, &c.[ Wilson's Lessee v. Campbell

Footnote 1 U.S. 126 (1785) ]

 


U.S. Supreme Court

WILSON'S LESSEE v. CAMPBELL, 1 U.S. 126 (1785)

 1 U.S. 126 (Dall.)

Wilson's Lessee
v.
Campbell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

April Term, 1785

Ejectment. Yeates, for the defendant, when called upon at the trial to consels Lease, Entry and Ouster, confessed Lease, Entry, and Ouster for part only of the tenements laid in the declaration.

This was opposed by Bradford, who contended, that the defendant having taken general defence, when he first pleaded, and entered into the common rule, he must now confess Lease, Entry and Ouster as to the whole; but the plaintiff can recover no more than he proves the defendant to be in possession of. 1 Att. Prac. 317.

By the Court: The defendant must in this case, confess Lease, Entry, and Ouster for the whole tenements laid in the declaration.*

Footnotes

[Footnote *] This case was determined at N.P. Carlisle on the 16 May, 1785, before McKean, Chief Justice, &c.[ Wilson's Lessee v. Campbell

Footnote 1 U.S. 126 (1785) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.