1301 NETHERLAND, WARDEN v. TUGGLE ON APPLICATION TO VACATE STAY OF EXECUTION No. A-91O. Decided May 15, 1996 517 U.S. 1301
Subscribe to Cases that cite 517 U.S. 1301
Case Resources
Link/Embed this Document
| Download |
 Download PDF
|
| URL | |
| Embed |
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/517/1301/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/517/1301/case.html
OCTOBER TERM, 1995
Syllabus
NETHERLAND, WARDEN v. TUGGLE
ON APPLICATION TO VACATE STAY OF EXECUTION No. A-91O. Decided May 15, 1996
An application to vacate the Fourth Circuit's order staying respondent Tuggle's execution has been filed. However, there is no such stay in effect in this case. Although Tuggle asked the Fourth Circuit both to stay his execution and to stay issuance of its mandate in his case, the court order only stayed the issuance of its mandate.
CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST, Circuit Justice.
Applicant has filed an application to vacate an order of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit staying the execution of respondent Tuggle. It is my understanding, however, that no such stay of execution is in effect. While Tuggle asked the Court of Appeals both to stay his execution and to stay issuance of its mandate in his case, see Tuggle v. Netherland, 79 F.3d 1386 (1996), the Court of Appeals' order only stayed the issuance of its mandate for a period of 30 days. Hence there is no stay of execution for me to vacate.