CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, 382 U.S. 422 (1966)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 382 U.S. 422
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/382/422/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/382/422/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, 382 U.S. 422 (1966)
382 U.S. 422CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY
RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS.
No. 751.Decided January 24, 1966.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 752, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al., also on appeal from the same court.
242 F. Supp. 414, affirmed.
Jordan Jay Hillman, Bryce L. Hamilton and John C. Danielson for appellants in No. 751. Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for appellant in No. 752.
Eldon Martin, Robert J. Cooney, Frank S. Farrell, Robert G. Gehrz, William P. Higgins, Curtis H. Berg, John H. Bishop, Louis E. Torinus, Jr., and Paul M. Sand for appellees in both cases.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.