DRUEDING v. DEVLIN, 380 U.S. 125 (1965)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 380 U.S. 125
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/380/125/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/380/125/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
DRUEDING v. DEVLIN, 380 U.S. 125 (1965)
380 U.S. 125 DRUEDING ET AL. v. DEVLIN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 772.
Decided March 1, 1965.
234 F. Supp. 721, affirmed.
Lawrence Speiser, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Edward L. Genn for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO, 380 U.S. 125 (1965)
380 U.S. 125 CITY OF CORONADO ET AL. v. SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 763.
Decided March 1, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 227 Cal. App. 2d 455, 38 Cal. Rptr. 834.
George A. Blackstone for appellants.
Aaron W. Reese and Burnham Enersen for San Diego Unified Port District et al., and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Ariel C. Hilton, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.