DRUEDING v. DEVLIN
380 U.S. 125 (1965)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

DRUEDING v. DEVLIN, 380 U.S. 125 (1965)

380 U.S. 125

DRUEDING ET AL. v. DEVLIN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 772.
Decided March 1, 1965.

234 F. Supp. 721, affirmed.

Lawrence Speiser, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Edward L. Genn for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Page 380 U.S. 125, 126


CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/380/125/case.html">380 U.S. 125</a> (1965) 380 U.S. 125 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO, 380 U.S. 125 (1965)

380 U.S. 125

CITY OF CORONADO ET AL. v. SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 763.
Decided March 1, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 227 Cal. App. 2d 455, 38 Cal. Rptr. 834.

George A. Blackstone for appellants.

Aaron W. Reese and Burnham Enersen for San Diego Unified Port District et al., and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Ariel C. Hilton, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.