ARROW CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 452 (1964)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 375 U.S. 452
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/375/452/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/375/452/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
ARROW CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 452 (1964)
375 U.S. 452 ARROW CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 467.
Decided January 20, 1964.
219 F. Supp. 43, affirmed.
Christian V. Graf for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
William A. Goichman, Joseph C. Bruno and Edward Munce for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
Ernest R. von Starck, Robert H. Young and Carl Helmetag, Jr. for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to be added as a party appellee is granted. The motion to correct the caption to include the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Highway Express Lines, Inc., and Modern Transfer Co., Inc., as parties appellee is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.