BROTHERHOOD, MAINTENANCE, WAY EMPLOYES v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 216 (1963)
Subscribe to Cases that cite MAINTENANCE, WAY EMPLOYES v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 216
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/375/216/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/375/216/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
BROTHERHOOD, MAINTENANCE, WAY EMPLOYES v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 216 (1963)
375 U.S. 216 BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MICHIGAN.
No. 510.Decided December 9, 1963.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 511, Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same Court.
221 F. Supp. 19, affirmed.
Clarence M. Mulholland, Richard R. Lyman, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., William G. Mahoney and Harry A. Carson for appellants in No. 510. Charles S. Rhyne, Edward D. Means, Jr. and Alfred J. Tighe for appellants in No. 511.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
Edward K. Wheeler, Hewitt S. Biaett, Robert G. Seaks and Kenneth H. Ekin for appellee carriers.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.