DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)
Subscribe to Cases that cite INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/364/627/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/364/627/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)
364 U.S. 627 DENVER CHICAGO TRANSPORT CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 503.
Decided January 9, 1961.
183 F. Supp. 785, affirmed.
Thomas F. Kilroy for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT v. STEWART, 364 U.S. 627 (1961)
364 U.S. 627 OREGON-NEVADA-CALIFORNIA FAST FREIGHT, INC., v. STEWART ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 521.
Decided January 9, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 223 Ore. 314, 353 P.2d 541.
Ferris F. Boothe for appellant.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Alfred B. Thomas and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.