FOSDICK v. LINZELL, 359 U.S. 230 (1959)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 359 U.S. 230
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/359/230/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/359/230/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
FOSDICK v. LINZELL, 359 U.S. 230 (1959)
359 U.S. 230 FOSDICK v. LINZELL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 704.
Decided April 6, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Robert Fosdick, appellant, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
BRISTOL v. HEATON, 359 U.S. 230 (1959)
359 U.S. 230 BRISTOL ET AL. v. HEATON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, TENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 581, Misc.
Decided April 6, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 317 S. W. 2d 86.
Appellants pro se.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, James N. Ludlum, First Assistant Attorney General, and Leonard Passmore and John Reeves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.