FOSDICK v. LINZELL
359 U.S. 230 (1959)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

FOSDICK v. LINZELL, 359 U.S. 230 (1959)

359 U.S. 230

FOSDICK v. LINZELL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 704.
Decided April 6, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Robert Fosdick, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


BRISTOL v. HEATON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/359/230/case.html">359 U.S. 230</a> (1959) 359 U.S. 230 (1959) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BRISTOL v. HEATON, 359 U.S. 230 (1959)

359 U.S. 230

BRISTOL ET AL. v. HEATON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, TENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 581, Misc.
Decided April 6, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 317 S. W. 2d 86.

Appellants pro se.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, James N. Ludlum, First Assistant Attorney General, and Leonard Passmore and John Reeves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 359 U.S. 230, 231




Official Supreme Court caselaw is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia caselaw is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.